To Schedule an
interview with a Walid Shoebat, Call:
or use our quick and easy:
Do-it-yourself
Guest Booking Form
(If
you prefer to schedule by phone call: 626-791-1896.)
To see our entire Guest Lineup
Click
Here
**********************************************************************************
Taking a
Scholarly Look at the End of the World
The majority of
American evangelicals believe that
the Antichrist system must be exclusively European.
And, so
far, history’s worst dictators seem to confirm that.
But
after thorough study within a lifetime of
following both the Muslim and Christian religions, one intriguing
expert on the
subject says our focus should shift to the
Ironically,
as Shoebat points out in a recently
published article (see below), Biblical context actually makes perfect
sense of
a possible Islamic, not a European, ultimate evil—and he’s prepared to
spell
that out in his “three-challenges” theory.
Meanwhile, other evangelicals are impressed by Shoebat’s
reasoning.
Biblical Prophesy scholar Chuck Missler says, “I always appreciated Mr.
Shoebat’s scholarly
work on end-times, which present excellent and convincing arguments.”
Whether as a
participant in an
intellectual debate or on his own as an insightful guest, Shoebat can
drill deeper
into his case to support this alarming notion—one that may already be
playing
itself out in the countless and ongoing terror attacks happening around
the
world today.
THE DEBATE OVER
Does
the beast of Revelation involve Middle Eastern
Muslim nations, is it exclusively European, or is it both?
Some say the notion that Islam could play a
prominent role in the coming revival of the
So,
could
Islam play a role in this end-times scenario?
You might think to yourself—so what?
Why should we care? Well, why
then did the Almighty give us Daniel and Revelations?
Even better still — why did God give us all
the Messianic prophesies regarding Jesus’ first coming? Careless
followers that
missed these ended up without salvation, regardless of whether they
sacrificed
lambs in the Temple or obeyed the law—when it comes to the issue of
Messiah,
they missed the most crucial event in history.
All for not paying close attention to Bible Prophecy. And what
about the
second coming? Are we to be careless
with respect to the evidence presented in the Bible? I am not saying
that you
could lose your salvation, but if you end up on the side of Antichrist,
you
never had salvation in the first place.
Yet
today,
the debate is brewing—what about the threat of Islam? Did the Bible
warn us
about it? Are we supposed to keep our focus exclusively on
To
shed
light on the implications of such detailed evidence (which spawned
countless
challenges and questions) I decided to write God’s War on
Terror regarding Islam’s involvement in
end-times. Consequently, I get
challenges daily, not only by Muslims that want me dead but also from
Christians who are dogmatic about their views. Ironically,
we have no record of any Christian
minister killed for exposing the E.U. as the work of Satan, yet we have
millions who gave their lives for standing up to Islam. So please allow
me to
alleviate some pressure and present you with only three challenges:
CHALLENGE 1: Did traditional
Prophecy scholars teach that
You
might
be shocked to know that the highest caliber commentators of old did not
believe
that
Many
of our
best western scholars on Bible prophecy believed that Islam would be a
major
player and will revive in the end of days as part of this end-time
beast. John Wesley
interpreted the Iron in
Daniel 2 as Islam (Works, 1841). Hilaire
Belloc foresaw Islam‘s rise.2 Gregory
Palamus of Thessalonica interpreted the martyrdom of Christians during
the
Great Tribulation to come from Islam.
Josiah Litch interpreted
Revelation as the ushering in of Islam.3 He even described
the
magnitude of Islam’s role being Antichrist to the extent of calling it
the
“general agreement among Christians, especially protestant
commentators.” Cyril
of Jerusalem (315-368 A.D) in
his Divine Institutes believed that Antichrist
proceeds forth from the
region of ancient
John
Calvin interpreted Daniel 2 eastern leg as the
Eastern-Roman Islamic Empire and that Daniel 11:37 applied to the
Muslims. 7
Even Jonathan Edwards the great American congregational preacher,
revivalist, and president of
Even Sir Robert Anderson, perhaps one of the best prophecy experts who unlocked the seventy weeks of Daniel, in his remarkable book The Coming Prince, insists to focus on the Levant (Eastern) parts rather than the Adriatic (West). 10
Countless other Bible
commentators warned about
Islam being the kingdom of Antichrist—Selnecker, Nigrinus, Chytraeus,
Bullinger, Foxe, Napier, Pareus, John Cotton, Thomas Parker, Increase
Mather,
Cotton Mather, and George Stanley Faber. 11
Also added to the list is Rev. Professor Dr. Francis Nigel Lee who sums up the traditional view in his excellent work Islam in the Bible: “from the seventh century onward – [the two legs] would degenerate respectively into the Papacy (which progressively took over the West) and Islam (which progressively took over the East.” (p. 5)
Making
While contemporary
prophesy analysts trumpet the
idea that the fourth composite of Daniel 2 iron metal as strictly
European,
traditionalist views differ. Dr. Matthew
Henry comments: "Who is this enemy—whose rise, reign and ruin are here
foretold? Interpreters are not in
agreement. Some will have the
Others make the
‘little horn’ to be the
Most
students of prophecy that ascribe to a revival of the Roman Empire
ignore that North Africa (Phut) encompasses five Muslim
nations historically part of the western wing of the Roman
Empire, and
already mentioned literally in several end-times references. In order for the exclusively European model
to fit, the whole of this Muslim region must be irrelevant. So what part of the Roman pie do we slice off
and what parts do we include?
CONTEMPORARY
VS TRADITIONAL
So
what happened? Why do we have such a
variation between
contemporary versus traditional? The
problem began in 1981 when Greece joined as the tenth nation in the
European
Union and many sounded a false alarm that announced they unlocked the
mystery
and have the fulfillment of Revelation 17, all with its ten horns, to
later be
embarrassed when the European Union mushroomed into twenty some
nations.
Instead
of pulling back their books, these
analysts ran back to the drawing board, not to confess their error, but
to insist
that the E.U. model must shrink to only ten.. They still chose to
finagle with
the theory. Some, like Arnold
Fruchtenbaum, realized that this was wrong:
“It has become common today to refer
to the
ten kingdoms as being in
According
to Fruchtenbaum, the European model
comprises only one tenth, a mere slice of the whole pie.
Jamieson Fausset & Brown insist that,
“the ten toes are not upon the one foot (the west), as these
interpretations
require, but on the two (east and west) together, so that any theory
which
makes the ten kingdoms belong to the west
alone must err.”
CHALLENGE 2: Besides the
argument on whether Magog is
Only
if you
ponder this question can you grasp its magnitude. On
one occasion during a lecture to a group of
prominent Bible
prophecy teachers in the Pre-Trib Prophecy Conference in Dallas, I
asked this
question and no one raised a hand to answer.
In
frustration, I pointed to Dr. Randall Price, a known Prophecy teacher
and asked
him to respond, in which he pointed that when it comes to literal
references there are none.
Grant Jeffrey, another known author, once attempted to respond
with
Grant
Jeffrey chose one of the most fundamentalist Muslim nations as a
response to
find non-Muslim nations in end-times.
David Reagan of the Lion and Lamb
Ministries with frustration pointed to Mystery
Babylon
14
ignoring that the crucial word in that question is “literal”. If
CHALLENGE
3: In every portrayal of Christ’s return to the
earth, is He not fighting
a nation that today is Muslim?
The
significance of this question is as follows
—scholars are unanimous, that Christ’s second coming must happen after Antichrist appears on the scene.
Christ’s mission will be to destroy Antichrist and establish His
Millennium
kingdom. The European Union model has the Muslim hordes destroyed
before the
Tribulation period. Yet the text shows that Messiah Himself deals with
Muslim
nations.
The next
prophecy conference you attend ask, “Is Jesus on earth on the Day of the Lord?” Ezekiel
tells us of that day, “For
the day is near, even the Day of the Lord is near” (Ezekiel 30:3). Yet
this is when “
Perhaps
sharing a few from the volume of hundreds of
prophecies of Jesus’ wars during the Great Tribulation can shed more
light on
the matter: “See Jehovah rides on a swift cloud and is coming
to
Even
in Christ’s judgment of the nations (Joel 3) He
is fighting Muslim entities. “Now what
have you against me, O Tyre and Sidon [Lebanon] and all you regions of
Philistia [Gaza]” (Joel 3:4) It couldn’t
be more clear! It was as if Jesus
Himself was speaking directly to Hezbollah (
In
Isaiah 25:9-10 at the time of the Lord’s return, we
have Christ fighting
Even
in Isaiah 63, scholars unanimously agree that He
fights
Are
the Muslim nations in prophecy destroyed prior to
the Christ’s coming? Will the Antichrist
then establish his European rule?
Can anyone find a verse in the Bible in which
Christ fights and nations are literally mentioned which are not Muslim?
This
is why
many who exclusively see
REFERENCES
1
Lamplighter
Newsletter, David Reagan, January 2009 edition.
2
The Great
Heresies, chapter 4 March, 1936, page
127-128
3
Hosiah
Litch, The Three Woe Trumpets, Fall of The
4 Divine Institutes, 7:17
5 Paul Alvarus, Memoriale sanctorum
2.4
6
Martin Luther, Tischreden, Weimer ed.,
1, No. 330
7
Calvin On
Islam Revelation Prof. Dr. Francis Nigel
Lee, Lamp Trimmers
8
Jonathan
Edwards,
The Fall of Antichrist, Part VII, page 395, New York, Published by S.
Converse
1829
9
Jonathan Edwards, The Fall of
Antichrist, Part VII, page 399, New York, Published by S. Converse 1829
10
The
Coming Prince, Page 273
11
Froom:
op. cit., II pp. 323f, 325f, 331, 340f, 412f,
458 & 518f and also III pp. 40f, 74f, 125-31,
149,
183, 240f, &352f.
12
M. Henry: A Commentary on the Holy
Bible, with Practical Remarks andObservations,
13
Fruchtenbaum,
Footsteps of the Messiah,
page 36
14
Lamplighter
Newsletter, David Reagan, January 2009 edition.
ABOUT WALID SHOEBAT…

Born in Bethlehem of Judea, Walid's grandfather was the Muslim Mukhtar (chieftain) of Beit Sahour-Bethlehem (The Shepherd's Fields) and a friend of Haj-Ameen Al-Husseni, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem and notorious friend of Adolf Hitler.
Walid's great
grandfather, Abdullah Ali Awad-Allah, was also a fighter and close
associate of
both Abdul Qader and Haj Amin Al-Husseini, who led the Palestinians
against
As a young
man,
he became a member of the Palestinian Liberation Organization, and
participated
in acts of terror and violence against
After his
release, he continued his life of violence and rioting in
In 1993, Walid studied the Tanach (Jewish Bible) in a challenge to convert his wife to Islam. Six months later, after intense study, Walid realized that everything he had been taught about Jews was a lie. Convinced he was on the side of evil, he became an advocate for his former enemy.
Driven by a deep passion
to heal his own soul, and to bring the truth about the Jews and Israel
to the
world, Walid shed his former life and his work as a software engineer
and set
out to tirelessly bring the cause of Israel to tens of thousands of
people
throughout the world: churches and synagogues, civic groups, government
leaders
and media.
Walid has
written several online books including "Dear Muslim, Let Me Tell You
Why I
Believed" and "
Walid is an
American citizen and lives in the
Engagements:
Walid has
spoken
all over
Speaking
Highlights:
Press:
Advocacy
for Muslims
Other
Notable Events
Excerpts
From Those Who Have Heard Him: